AANFM RCA
1923 - 1999
Canadien
Verticale nocturne
huile sur toile
signé et au verso signé et daté
59 7/8 x 39 po, 152.1 x 99 cm
Estimation : 80 000 $ - 120 000 $ CAD
Vendu pour : 111 150 $
Exposition à : Heffel Toronto – 13 avenue Hazelton
PROVENANCE
Galerie Simon Blais, Montreal
Private Collection, Montreal
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
Constance Naubert-Riser, Jean McEwen, Colour in Depth: Paintings and Works on Paper, 1951 - 1987, The Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, 1987, reproduced page 75
EXPOSITION
The Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, Jean McEwen, Colour in Depth: Paintings and Works on Paper, 1951 - 1987, December 11, 1987 - January 24, 1988, catalogue #24
One becomes aware of the originality of Jean McEwen’s painting - and Verticale nocturne is a splendid example of his production from the early sixties - when we attempt to associate it with one of the two main currents of the time: the post-Automatist painting of Rita Letendre, Lise Gervais and Jean Lefébure, or the Plasticiens’ aesthetic of rigorous geometry and thin layers of paint. On the one hand, McEwen was a master of the colour field and did not maintain the opposition of objects against a receding background. As art historian and author Constance Naubert-Riser has pointed out, McEwen maintains depth in his painting only through colour. In that sense he is closer to Sam Francis, whom he met in Paris, or to Mark Rothko, Barnett Newman or Clyfford Still than to the followers of Paul-Émile Borduas. On the other hand, even though he often adopted the vertical format, like the idea of “the zip”, as in Newman’s painting of a vertical passage between two masses, McEwen rejected the hard-edge presentation of the Plasticiens. There was no need of masking tape to get neat lines between the colours, as in Guido Molinari’s or Claude Tousignant’s painting. Not only did McEwen not use the roller brush to get a perfectly neutral layer of painting, but he painted directly on the canvas with his hands, obtaining a very peculiar kind of texture which has nothing to do with Jean-Paul Riopelle’s textural use of the painting knife, or with the heavy impastos of Borduas’s last period, the Black and White works that he painted in Paris. In the case of McEwen, the tool is more than an extension of the hand - it is the hand itself! Moreover, the colour in McEwen is never free of its emotional content – it is never just a way to denote different areas in the painting. On the contrary, as in Verticale nocturne, the black stripes on each side and in the middle are vibrating with some blue to justify the word “nocturne” in the title, and the red vertical planes are like a thin veil showing both blue and black in its small openings. We do circulate to a certain depth in this painting, but this va-et-vient (to-and-fro) happens in a rather narrow space, where background and surface are not very far apart.
For McEwen, the title is never gratuitous. On the contrary, it is well thought out, as a small poem that refers directly to the emotional content of the painting. Verticale nocturne indicates that it has something to do with the emotions of the night.
One is reminded of the famous debate between the partisans of drawing like Philippe de Champaigne and the partisans of colour like Roger de Piles, in the seventeenth century. For the first group, only drawing could convey ideas, and it could have the dignity of a discourse. Colour from this perspective was just an ornament, a finishing touch to get closer to the appearances of things. For the “Rubenists”, as they were called, on the contrary, colour, which was specific to painting only, was a language of its own. The comparison was done with the rhetoric of an orator such as Cicero, and it was said, for instance, that a logical debate alone could not gain the conviction of a jury, without the emotional appeal of the speaker. This was the role of colour in painting: not to embellish the presentation, but to give it an appeal that went to the heart of the onlooker and gained his assent. Certainly, McEwen would have been in the Rubenists' camp if he had lived in the seventeenth century!
We thank François-Marc Gagnon of the Gail and Stephen A. Jarislowsky Institute of Studies in Canadian Art, Concordia University, recent recipient of the medal of the Académie des lettres du Québec for his lifetime achievement, for contributing the above essay.
Please note: this work is reproduced on the poster for the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts exhibition, one of which accompanies this lot.
Estimation : 80 000 $ - 120 000 $ CAD
Tous les prix affichés sont en dollars canadiens
Bien que nous ayons pris soin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information publiée, des erreurs ou omissions peuvent se produire. Toute enchère est soumise à nos
modalités et conditions de vente. Les enchérisseurs doivent s’assurer qu’ils sont satisfaits de la condition du lot avant d’enchérir. Les rapports de condition sont disponibles sur demande.